Three working AI systems in your businessin three weeks.

It's scoped to your business, so I don't publish a one-size number. What I can tell you here: it's one fixed figure for a fixed scope, paid half to book and half at handoff. No retainer required, no percentage fees, no add-ons you didn't ask for. After your fit call you'll have the exact investment in writing within a day, and you can decide from there. No pressure attached either way.

Wherever possible, ones you already pay for: ChatGPT or Claude, your email, your calendar, your booking system. If something new genuinely earns its place, I'll say why, you subscribe directly, and I take nothing for the recommendation. Most of these workflows run on tools under $60 a month, often on subscriptions you already have.

This comes first, not last. By default, the workflows I set up keep client-identifying information out of AI tools entirely; plenty of high-value workflows never touch client files at all. Where a workflow genuinely needs to touch client information, it runs in a business workspace with AI training turned off, and you get the data path in writing: where it lives, who can see it, what your regulator requires, and what BC's privacy law (PIPA) expects. If you're in a regulated practice, this privacy review is named in your proposal.

No. Business accounts on the tools I set up (ChatGPT Team, Claude for Work) don't train on your data, and that setting is part of the setup, not an afterthought. If a tool can't make that promise, it doesn't get used for anything sensitive.

You're exactly who this is for. You won't build anything, and nothing I set up requires you to become technical to keep it alive. If a tool needs that, I picked the wrong tool.

That's the bar. Every workflow that drafts anything gets tuned against your real emails and your real voice, and you review everything before it goes out. AI that sounds like a robot is AI you'll stop using, which defeats the whole point.

Sometimes that's the right call, and I'll say so if it is. But a VA still needs systems to work inside, and most of this admin doesn't need a person, it needs a process. The Reset builds the system either of you can run. Plenty of owners do both: the workflows absorb the repetitive drafting, and the humans do the parts that need a human.

Then you'll hear it from me in week one, not at the end. If the audit finds fewer than three workflows worth setting up, the engagement converts down to just the audit and map, the difference comes back to you, and you keep everything. I'd rather lose an engagement than pad one.

Your Opportunity Map ranks everything we found, so nothing gets lost. You can add a fourth workflow during the engagement, come back for a second Reset later, or add monthly help. All of that exists, and none of it is required. The three workflows stand on their own.

You're not dependent on me, and that's by design: the playbook is written so the workflows survive vacations, new hires, and my absence. After the two weeks (plus the 60-day breakage promise above), you can run everything yourself indefinitely, bring me back per-fix, or add a monthly option if you want someone watching the AI landscape for you. Most owners just run it.

About four hours of scheduled sessions across three weeks, plus roughly an hour of prep before kickoff. Scheduled around your week.

No. I set up working systems in proven tools. If your situation genuinely needs custom software, I'll tell you on the call and give you the three questions to ask a developer, free.